人權領袖及奧斯卡導演退出山達基教會

當山達基信徒已35年的保羅．海吉斯（Paul Haggis），寫信給教會發言人湯米．戴維斯（Tommy Davis ），聲明退出該教會。

海吉斯曾以「衝擊效應」（Crash）與「登峰造擊」（Million Dollar Baby）影片連續兩度獲奧斯卡獎。他爲兩片撰寫劇本，並是後者導演。他也製作了很多著名的影片和電視劇本，例如「007量子危機」（Quantum of Solace）和「皇家夜總會」（Casino Royale）。

海吉斯是公民權和人權領袖，慈善機構創辦人，及積極支持者。

聖地牙哥山達基教會支持禁止同性戀結婚的第8號提案，海吉斯身爲人權領袖不可以接受，並質問戴維斯，何以未發表聲明駁斥。戴維斯同意鄭重追究，但教會數月來也沒有行動。海吉斯在信中寫道：「山達基拒絕駁斥這些偏執、虛偽的言論，是懦夫的表現。我別無其他文字形容。」

戴維斯在電視上否認「斷絕」的存在，海吉斯看到後感覺到震驚，因為他知道這是謊話，他的妻子被教會指令切斷與父母的關係，一年半以上沒有講過話，只因為他們多年前退出教會。

海吉斯看到戴維斯這麼容易說謊，不禁問自己，他還說了什麼謊？

關於聖彼得堡時報的山達基特輯報道，揭露教會主席大衛．密斯凱維吉的暴行，時常毒打下屬，海吉斯說：「這些不是外人發掘骯髒事來對付我們，這些人是最高級的主管人員，差點兒把一生奉獻給教會，麥克．雲特更是當了教會的首席發言人20年。當你們把懺悔的隱私公開，用來攻擊這些主管人員，我感覺到真正不安，別的牧師情願入獄也保守秘密。」

山達基教會通過中央社發出新聞稿回應，表示不採取任何政治立場，而是追求人權自由。事實上，教會花了很多人力和財力尋求政治勢力，例如創立美國國家婦女立法人基金會，推行有利教會的法例。教會的所謂人權運動，等於毀滅精神科，以聯合國宣言做主題的表面機構—青少年人權協會—並不是聯合國承認的非政府機構，也不歡迎用聯合國場地搞活動。

羅恩賀伯特在戴尼提寫道：

「性變態者（在戴尼提包括一切形式，第二動力的偏差，例如同性戀、性虐待狂等）實際上是嚴重的生理病。」（在山達基的信仰，第二動力包括性行為。）

"The sexual pervert (and by this term Dianetics, to be brief, includes any and all forms of deviation in dynamic two such as homosexuality, lesbianism, sexual sadism, etc., and all down the catalog of Ellis and Krafft-Ebing) is actually quite ill physically."

羅恩賀伯特認爲這些偏差錯亂的人應當從中社會盡快拔除，並關起來，避免不道德的傳染，和品格的毀壞 —《生存的科學》，第一冊，第十三章。

參考連結
衝擊效應奧斯卡導演海吉斯 退出山達基教會，法新社 http://www.webcitation.org/5kvTz6Y13
Paul Haggis on Scientology: 'Morally reprehensible' ， Los Angeles Times http://bit.ly/1mJdkP

海吉斯現任慈善機構職位：
* Founder, Artists For Peace and Justice,
* Co-Founder, BrandAid Foundation and BrandAid Project
* Board Member, Office of The Americas
* Board Member, Center For The Advancement of Non-Violence
* Member and active supporter, Amnesty International
* Member, President’s Council, Defenders of Wildlife
* Member and fundraiser, Environment California and CalPirg
* Member and Award Recipient, American Civil Liberties Union
* Member and supporter, Death Penalty Focus
* Member and supporter, Equality For All
* Fundraiser, NPH (Our Little Brothers) – for the children of the slums of Haiti
* Member, Citizens Commission on Human Rights
* Patron with Honors, IAS

前任慈善機構：
* Trustee, Religious Freedom Trust
* Board Member and fundraiser, Hollywood Education and Literacy Project
* Board Member and fundraiser, For The Arts, For Every Child
* Board Member and fundraiser, The Christic Institute
* Founding Board Member, Earth Communication Office
* Working Board Member, Environmental Media Association
* Fundraiser, El Rescate – Human Rights for El Salvador
* Fundraiser, PAVA – Aid and Human Rights in Guatemala

榮獲以下公民權和人權獎:
* Valentine Davies Award – Writers Guild of America
*Bill of Rights Award – American Civil Liberties Union
*Hubert H. Humphrey Civil Rights Award – Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
*Peace & Justice Award – Office of the Americas, presented by Daniel Ellsberg
*Signis Award, Venezia, World Catholic Association
*ALMA Award – National Council of Latino Civil Rights
*Ethel Levitt Award for Humanitarian Service – Levitt & Quinn
*Prism Award – Entertainment Industries Council
*Humanitas Prize (2) – Humanitas
*Legacy Award, for Artistic and Humanitarian Achievement
*Environmental Media Award – EMA
*EMA Green Seal Award – EMA
*Image Award – NAACP
*Creative Integrity Award – Multicultural Motion Picture Association
*EDGE Awards (2) – Entertainment Industries Council
*Artistic Freedom Award – City of West Hollywood
*Catholics in Media Award – Catholics in Media Associates

山達基教會 在法被判組織詐欺及非法配藥

湯姆克魯斯所信奉山達基教會 在法被判詐欺（法新社）—雅虎奇魔

湯姆克魯斯所信奉山達基教會 在法被判詐欺—雅虎香港

山達基教會被判組織詐欺罪（歐新社)—雅虎奇魔

汤姆克鲁斯所信奉山达基教会 在法被判欺诈—大纪元

汤姆克鲁斯所信奉山达基教会 在法被判欺诈—大纪元澳大利亞．新西蘭

法科學教派欺詐罪成罰60萬歐羅

Church of Scientology Convicted of Fraud （影片）

Scientologists convicted of fraud in France 世界性頭條報道之一

The Court's Ruling—Infinite Complacency

法庭判決

1. 有罪 Alain Rosenberg 名人中心常務董事 - 2年 監禁 (緩刑) 罰款 30,000 歐元 *+
2. 有罪 Didier Michaux 書店的明星推銷員 - 18月 監禁 (緩刑) 罰款 20,000 歐元 *
3. 有罪 Jean-François Valli 書店推銷員 - 18月 監禁 (緩刑) 罰款 10,000 歐元 *
4. 有罪 Sabine Jacquart 名人中心總裁 - 10月 監禁 (緩刑) 罰款 5,000 歐元 *+
5. 有罪 Aline Fabre 淨化程式監督 - 罰款 2,000 歐元 ~
6. 有罪 Marie Anne Pasturel 供應淨化程式維他命 - 罰款 1,000 歐元 ~
7. 有罪 Celebrity Centre 山達基名人中心 - 罰款 400,000 歐元 * &
8. 有罪 SEL Scientology Bookstore 山達基書店 - 罰款 200,000 歐元 * &

* = organized fraud 有組織性詐欺
+ = complicity in the illegal exercise of pharmacy 非法配藥共謀
~ = illegal exercise of pharmacy 非法配藥
& = ordered to publish judgment in newspaper 法庭指令在各大報章和山達基網站刊登判決

山達基教會和教會領導人在法國被控詐騙脆弱會員，兩個分支機構 — 名人中心（Celebrity Center）和一家書店(SEL)，被控在1990年代敲詐會員財物。

跟過去裁判不同，這次是包括了有組織性詐欺，因此機構及領導人也有罪！ 以下人士，請慶祝你們在台灣，不是法國：李美足、吳英辰、薛智元、陳海倫、Evan Lee （想也供應了不少維他命）、淨化程式監督們、擦爆卡天使們。

以後法國山達基便是由罪犯領導的犯罪機構，羅恩賀伯特的教導是不可以更改的。

弄死多人的淨化程式成為非法，不可以成為清新者，橋斷了！ 什麼排毒、戒毒機構也要關門了。

為了法國山達基人相信教會和領導人有罪，教會除了在各大報章刊登判決之外，還要在山達基網站刊登，法官太了解山達基人了！ 可是山達基必然上訴，要等候敗訴才可以看到刊登了的判決，但上訴相等於自動加罰款，上訴的律師費和公關費比這次罰款高丫！你們的捐款就是這樣花了。

雖然沒有禁止山達基團體在法國活動，但是內裏大有文章。檢控處建議不檢控，因為法官堅持，審訊才可以進行。檢控官原本的要求包括徹底禁止山達基活動，但他也不知道法例被靜靜地更改了，不可以因為組織性詐欺而禁止機構的活動。此事被發現時大眾嘩然，立刻被更正及展開調查，但來不及應用在這個審訊，罪名成立也不能禁止山達基。

本人對這個判決很滿意。法國法庭在過去的山達基審訊中，多次發生文件失縱事件，很明顯法庭行政被滲透了，猶如過去美國的白雪行動，山達基大規模滲透美國政府各機關，包括聯邦調查局。

山達基醜聞成為全世界頭條

以下是近日山達基頭條醜聞的好摘要（英）:

我的 plurk：

湯姆克魯斯所信奉山達基教會 在法被判欺詐

名編劇家保羅·哈吉斯宣布離開山達基教會，他是奧斯卡獎歷史上第一位連續兩年獲得最佳編劇獎的劇作家 bit.ly/320MNn

美國全國性電視廣播節目，前教徒指控山達基教主大衛密斯凱維吉的暴力統治 ABC News bit.ly/2AEMGQ

山達基首席發言人在ABC電視受訪問時拒絕回答問題，不顧而去。當年BBC訪問時則用羅恩賀伯特的對抗及打碎壓制者處理方法，引起著名的輿論界事件，上任首席發言人不久離教。bit.ly/w9V4C

還有，澳洲士兵完成2萬5千澳元的山達基課程兩日後自殺，上吊和觸電死亡，教會拒絕把聽析檔案交給驗屍官 bit.ly/1eDqUN

Knowing what to know

Someone made up the phrase "knowing what to know" in response to LRH's study tech - learning how to learn.

Even if study tech is not bad, you will forever be stuck in the high school, secondary school stage, where you are told what to learn, all the way to OT VIII, if you were in Scientology. In university, you are supposed to develop critical thinking skills, without explicitly written on the curricula. Knowledge is unlimited, and knowing is not the ultimate aim, but knowing what to know is, meaning having the ability to think critically.

This is inline with ancient Chinese philosophy：學海無崖......有崖隨無崖，殆已。

In science, mathematics, logic, theories and observations help to develop thinking skills. Post graduate studies will end up in Doctor of Philosophy - the school of thought. It's similar in arts, where you pick your supporting evidences to get to your conclusions. Also, many arts students take minor courses in philosophy and psychology, understanding how people think.

LRH is successful for training people not to think for themselves. All news released from the Church is true. And all negative news from major newspapers are lies. It just can't be true. If the anti-Scientology camp are that powerful in controlling all media, they are better off appointing politicians and presidents via public opinion. The Church of Scientology would have lost their tax exempt status and even being banned altogether.

Paul Haggis has deflected from the Church. He is a very famous screen writer and director, having won multiple Oscars, responsible for the most recent Jame Bones scripts. From his letter, it's obvious that if Scientologists just start thinking, Scientology or just the Church will collapse. He reasoned that even if a fraction of the church's reported abuse is true, it is not tolerable for him.

He asked if the CoS San Diego is openly supporting proposition 8, an anti-gay legislation. He received no reply. For a true Civil and Human Rights activists, he cannot be a part of it by remaining in Scientology.

He also spotted that Tommy Davis is lying on TV, when he said that disconnection do not exist. Paul's wife was disconnected from her father for trivial matters.

There is no surprise that Marty Rathbun, the chief of the new independence movement, reported that there are plenty of deflections left and right. The Church do not demand freeloader debts even if staff do not sign non-disclosure like agreements. Money are refunded when they are supposed to. Private investigates are called off from harassing deflectors. The Church is playing nice.

High level deflections make many Scientologists think. If OT VIII's deflect, your auditors deflect, previous second in command of Scientology deflects, previous chief spokesman deflects, movie stars deflect, Oscar winners deflect, what about you? I would like to add that if you are an upright citizen in society, it is an embarrassment to stay in the Church - think about it, can you?

The problem with the independents is, if the Church play nice enough, there is no reason to leave the Church. And Marty will become insignificant overnight. The Church may revert to it's old self anytime when nobody is looking.

Dear Paul, lying about disconnection is bad, but how about disconnection itlself? It is apparent that you do not agree with it. It wasn't started with David Miscavige, but our LRH.

The best way to dismantle Scientology?

Rathbun's follower recently complained that in order to bring down David Miscavige, it is useless to piss off Scientologists by bringing up OT III data for example. We have to talk to Scientologists at their level of reality, talking about the crimes and abuses of DM specifically. Though he knows that many "Anonymous" are more interested in bringing down the "Church" rather than just using DM as a scape goat.

Being a Scientologists, obviously he missed a lot of facts that others cannot escape if they are connected to the Internet.

Before day one of the worldwide, on the street protests, everybody agrees that we should not attack the religion itself, but to let everybody knows what is the CoS through the victims and the crimes committed. Protesters include one happy family of

• non-Scientolgists who think that Scientology is a scam
• ex-Scientolgists who think the same
• and ex-Scientologists who still believe in Scientology, but wanted to bring down the CoS so they will not again be prosecuted by it - the Free Zoners

As time went on, fast approaching two years, the principles remain the same, that the aim is not to eliminate Scientology the religion. But the Free Zoners aren't that effective, in contribution, in numbers, and in the determination to bring down the whole Church. And in the heat of battle, courtesy are sometimes forgotten, so attacks on LRH and Scientology that made some ex-scientologists uncomfortable are unavoidable. Also, on a small protest sign, how can you explain all that to the public? So words like cult, scam, are used without reservation. It's free to express one's opinion after all.

Who thinks that Anonymous are here to save those who are firm believers of the church? Honestly it's a waste of time and very difficult if you are never a Scientologist. The first aim is to let the public know what is CoS to stop their expansion in the expense of the general public. Money making schemes like WISE, Narconon and Criminon are not working any more. If you believe the OT VIII's words, the church is desperate for donations because there are few new publics and Scientologists take fewer courses.

To make a Scientologist doubt about DM, the Church or LRH, it's just too difficult. It can be done because we know a lot more about Scientology than many high level Scientologists. For example, becoming a Clear means that you find out that you made up your past lifes, and OT VIII means that you find out that everything is made up, or something like that. But to talk to and convince a Scientologist means that you have to use their language, and their alien philosophy - in words of a Scientologist, their level of reality. It can be done but I doubt if one can carry on tediously for like two years. The effect will be minimal because you may be able to save a Scientologist or two. It's much more effective to turn up at the Orgs every month, every week, so the public and staff start to doubt what Anonymous are doing with so much conviction, so OT, and why the Orgs fail to confront and shatter suppression any more.

I welcome Rathbun's Independents, probably more ambitious that the Free Zoners. This is exactly what we are hoping for, someone to bring down CoS from the inside. Old critics are waiting for Rathbun and Rinder to speak out for years. This high profile challenge is good. If they don't believe in Scientology, it's better but perhaps less effective in bringing down CoS from the inside. We have enough OT's on the outside who thinks that Scientology is crap.

Do I worry about Rathbun? Not at all. Without professional writers, what they say and what they write are laughable, at least to the non-Scientologists. Rathbun is using LRH to attack DM, and of course DM will use LRH to counter attack if he can. For the first time, Scientologists have to "think", who is using LRH right, and who is telling the "truth" even at their level of reality. They cannot believer whatever the Church tell them to. Why would they believe in Rathbun? They have no choice but to doubt, even for LRH's words as used by both camps.

If Rathbun thinks that Anonymous is weak, that's a big mistake. The protesters numbers are down just because we have already set many records, and that we have already achieved many things that we set out to do. Imagine that Moxon has to run around the country to deal with AGP in LA, AO in Riverside, and now trying to get a single Anonymous in Las Vegas using make up charges. Not to mention that there are big lawsuits by BFG and some smaller ones. If Rathbun is successful it's because of Anonymous. If he spoke out two years ago it will be a ripple in the pond.

At most Rathbun will inherit what DM has now, and I'm sure he doesn't want the huge headache. The best scenerio will be that Scientologists split into two equal camps, constantly fighting each other.

Most Anonymous or not so Anonymous are more convinced than two years ago that the problem is with LRH. Any writers, academics, critical thinkers or scam artists can tell you that it's too easy to make up a theory, and the more you build on it the more it's believable. The only problem is whether the theory will stand up to review and criticism. LRH's only success is avoiding and eliminating criticism. It's a shame that he didn't live to deal with the arrival of the Internet. Or that he finds that life in a galaxy away is much more enjoyable without Anonymous?

聖希爾—25週年國際山達基人協會IAS晚會

準備好你的支票、現金、信用卡吧：

世界山達基企業協會 2006 台灣目錄

世界山達基企業協會 2006 台灣目錄（英）